The State of Continuous Controls Monitoring
What’s standing in the way of CCM adoption?
And what are the most successful organizations doing differently?
The second annual State of Continuous Controls Monitoring Report reveals answers from 250+ InfoSec leaders about automation, AI adoption, and the future of GRC.
Download the report and discover:
- The real ROI of AI and automation in GRC
- The number of frameworks the average organization is juggling
- Which GRC activities are most likely to be automated
- Exactly how much time organizations are spending on evidence collection
- How many organizations are delaying or eliminating important GRC activities because of resource constraints
- The top obstacles standing in the way of continuous monitoring
Whether you’re a CISO building the business case for automation and CCM, a GRC leader drowning in manual evidence collection, or a board member seeking better visibility into organizational risk, this report provides the data and insights you need to understand where the industry stands today — and where it’s headed tomorrow.
Having led security operations at global companies, I’ve seen firsthand how manual compliance processes create cascading failures. Every day an organization delays automation, they’re making an implicit choice: pay now in tech investments, or pay later in time, audit findings, and organizational risk. The 2,000+ person-hours that most organizations are burning on annual evidence collection are part of an unforgiving equation. The cost of transformation is real, but the cost of standing still is catastrophic.Roland Cloutier
Partner/Principal, The Business Protection Group; Former CSO TikTok, ByteDance, ADP & EMC
ON-DEMAND WEBINAR
2026 State of Continuous Controls Monitoring: Launch Webinar
We hosted the first conversation about RegScale’s 2nd annual State of Continuous Controls Monitoring Report, including insights from 250+ InfoSec leaders on automation, AI adoption, and the future of GRC.
